Eric Laurier

Our guest is Eric Laurier, Institute of Geography & the Lived Environment, Edinburgh University (whose own blog has the unimprovable title Ordinary Life As It Happens). Here he  gives us a capsule account of the EM/CA culture wars in the social sciences as they’ve played out in Human Geography.

Eric Laurier, University of Edinburgh

Eric Laurier, University of Edinburgh

On joining the company of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, you are told war stories of the early history of incomprehension, misunderstanding and antipathy it met from prominent figures in Sociology. The Purdue Symposium in Ethnomethodology from 1968 provides a transcript of one of the skirmishes that illustrates very nicely all of these qualities. In other disciplines there are other histories that have lead to other sorts of relationships.

Human Geography?

Human Geography from the 1960s until the 1980s was in large part in the grip of what it called a quantitative revolution and thus had no connection with either ethnomethodology nor conversation analysis (though someone may yet find one in the archives). Known by its members as the magpie discipline, Human Geography was nevertheless stealing shiny ideas from economics, demography, and behavioural psychology. Rejecting that former revolution, for the last twenty years Human Geography has been in a long ‘cultural turn’. Flying out of its nest it has been picking up jewels and silver from Marxism, post-structuralism, cultural studies, literary theory, gender studies and more.

When I say, then, that Human Geography has twigged the EMCA approach, it is the twig in the beak rather than the twig in the tree (of growing knowledge). It has been grasped in a certain way in order to fly with it. And it will be no surprise for me to grumble that it is held tight between the mandibles more as a methodology than as a distinctive approach to human action and reasoning.

Non-Representational Theory

What is interesting for me is how EMCA has become associated, as a methodology or as an 68A4C1F1-3A3C-4206-8017-F0A3783C01BEapproach, with the other knocked-off disciplinary goods that were woven into the nest during the same season. My work is then often situated in relation to Non-Representational Theory (NRT) and NRT is then the approach that I have then often found myself in dialogue with. Part of what one has to do in nesting EMCA within a new discipline is to try and understand what else was twigged when EMCA was and thus with what other approaches you will then need to differentiate yourself in dialogue with.

Advertisements

One thought on “Eric Laurier

  1. Pingback: Guest Blog: Nesting within your discipline | Research on Language and Social Interaction – Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s